StrategiesImplement an Archiving Solution That's Right for YouBy Thomas Schmidt
How serious can lost email be? Just ask the White House. Recently, the Bush administration took some heat for failing to keep adequate archives of its email. According to The Washington Post, the administration set aside the existing archiving system as part of a move from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Exchange, and its current system reportedly relies on a combination of backup tapes and hand sorting. In May, court documents revealed that the White House was unable to find emails sent during a period in 2003 that encompassed the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. Technical experts quoted by The Washington Post said the administration relied on an inadequate archiving system for storing the millions of emails sent through White House servers, despite court orders and statutes requiring the preservation of such records. And two groups, the “National Security Archive” and “Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington,” have filed lawsuits accusing the White House of violating the Federal Records Act, because of, according to these groups, its failure to preserve millions of emails -- a charge the White House rejects. With the recognition that email is as mission-critical as any other IT system, it's no surprise that organizations around the world are paying closer attention to archiving solutions that address resource management, retention management, and e-discovery management. This article looks at how IT organizations should go about evaluating and implementing these solutions. Getting Started The reasons for such steady growth aren't hard to find. Organizations today are finding themselves under increasing pressure, both legal and regulatory, to properly retain or delete documents. For example, recent amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure concerning the discovery of electronically stored information are exposing organizations to new risks and costs during litigation and subsequent discovery. For companies considering dedicated email archiving, there are two main alternatives to consider at the outset: in-house or hosted. The in-house alternative uses internal resources and IT infrastructure to process and store archived email messages. Most providers favor this category. Hosted solutions provide another option for companies with limited IT budgets and personnel, as well as companies wanting to avoid investing a lot of up-front money in a system. The next challenge involves determining the specific requirements for the email-archiving solution. What systems will it support? What is the volume of messages that will pass through it each day? What information should be retained? The answers to these questions will help set the criteria that will be used to select a product. Other important questions to ask include:
Once an archiving solution has been selected, start with a pilot installation, focusing on a small subset of the environment. Assuming the product-selection process was thorough, this should go smoothly. Consider dividing the environment into logical segments for a phased deployment. (It probably won’t be practical to turn on the archiving system for the entire enterprise.) A phased deployment also reduces the workload for the implementation team, which can’t be expected to support everything at once. Conclusion
Thomas Schmidt writes frequently about information security topics. He has more than 15 years’ experience as a writer and editor in high-tech publishing. |
ADVERTISEMENT Related ContentFast Fact
Forty-five percent of email users in the United States will use an archiving solution by the end of this year, and that percentage is expected to increase to 63% by the end of 2009. Podcast Audio ContentCIO Strategy Center is now available in audio format. This week's feature topic is: Preparing for a DisasterPlaytime: 8 min 07 sec |